The basal ganglia and cortex implement optimal decision making between alternative actions.
Scientific Abstract
Neurophysiological studies have identified a number of brain regions critically involved in solving the problem of action selection or decision making. In the case of highly practiced tasks, these regions include cortical areas hypothesized to integrate evidence supporting alternative actions and the basal ganglia, hypothesized to act as a central switch in gating behavioral requests. However, despite our relatively detailed knowledge of basal ganglia biology and its connectivity with the cortex and numerical simulation studies demonstrating selective function, no formal theoretical framework exists that supplies an algorithmic description of these circuits. This article shows how many aspects of the anatomy and physiology of the circuit involving the cortex and basal ganglia are exactly those required to implement the computation defined by an asymptotically optimal statistical test for decision making: the multihypothesis sequential probability ratio test (MSPRT). The resulting model of basal ganglia provides a new framework for understanding the computation in the basal ganglia during decision making in highly practiced tasks. The predictions of the theory concerning the properties of particular neuronal populations are validated in existing experimental data. Further, we show that this neurobiologically grounded implementation of MSPRT outperforms other candidates for neural decision making, that it is structurally and parametrically robust, and that it can accommodate cortical mechanisms for decision making in a way that complements those in basal ganglia.
Similar content
Preprint
Striatal dopamine reflects individual long-term learning trajectories
Paper
Benchmarking Predictive Coding Networks - Made Simple
2025. International Conference on Learning Representations
Paper
Predictive Coding Model Detects Novelty on Different Levels of Representation Hierarchy.
2025. Neural Comput, 37(8):1373-1408.
Free Full Text at Europe PMC
PMC7618029
The basal ganglia and cortex implement optimal decision making between alternative actions.
Scientific Abstract
Neurophysiological studies have identified a number of brain regions critically involved in solving the problem of action selection or decision making. In the case of highly practiced tasks, these regions include cortical areas hypothesized to integrate evidence supporting alternative actions and the basal ganglia, hypothesized to act as a central switch in gating behavioral requests. However, despite our relatively detailed knowledge of basal ganglia biology and its connectivity with the cortex and numerical simulation studies demonstrating selective function, no formal theoretical framework exists that supplies an algorithmic description of these circuits. This article shows how many aspects of the anatomy and physiology of the circuit involving the cortex and basal ganglia are exactly those required to implement the computation defined by an asymptotically optimal statistical test for decision making: the multihypothesis sequential probability ratio test (MSPRT). The resulting model of basal ganglia provides a new framework for understanding the computation in the basal ganglia during decision making in highly practiced tasks. The predictions of the theory concerning the properties of particular neuronal populations are validated in existing experimental data. Further, we show that this neurobiologically grounded implementation of MSPRT outperforms other candidates for neural decision making, that it is structurally and parametrically robust, and that it can accommodate cortical mechanisms for decision making in a way that complements those in basal ganglia.
Citation
2007.Neural Comput, 19(2):442-77.
Downloads
Similar content
Preprint
Striatal dopamine reflects individual long-term learning trajectories
Paper
Benchmarking Predictive Coding Networks - Made Simple
2025. International Conference on Learning Representations
Paper
Predictive Coding Model Detects Novelty on Different Levels of Representation Hierarchy.
2025. Neural Comput, 37(8):1373-1408.
Free Full Text at Europe PMC
PMC7618029